Wed Apr 24, 2013 4:23 am
thinkdontpray wrote:is there a general consensus on what the sequence(s) are going to add up to? a release date? album title? perhaps another red moon party?
Wed Apr 24, 2013 4:23 am
Wed Apr 24, 2013 5:03 am
Wed Apr 24, 2013 5:35 am
Wed Apr 24, 2013 6:55 am
Capt Kittinger wrote:Waiting on a new album, what is it that we all want to know? My bet is on release date (ie d/d/m/m/y/y), or album title, or both. The actual codes might lead us to a URL to find this info, or they may be the info itself.
Who knows.. but I personally think we're wasting our time trying to find meaning in the numbers at this stage. Everything indicates we've been drip-fed each clue/code so far, as others have theorised - it's leading up to a reveal, it's not something that can be cracked.. yet. I'm tending to the view that the codes may have something to do with a one-time pad (as others have thought), in which case we need all 6 codes plus a decryption key. IMHO!
Wed Apr 24, 2013 7:05 am
Wed Apr 24, 2013 7:08 am
b0qurant wrote:As it stands:
_ _ _ _ _ _ / 6 9 9 7 4 2 / 7 1 7 2 2 8 / 9 3 6 5 5 7 / _ _ _ _ _ _ / 5 1 9 2 2 5
Still shaky on: 6 9 9 7 4 2 (From NPR)
http://www.npr.org/blogs/allsongs/2013/ ... -a-mystery
http://pitchfork.com/news/50454-listen- ... c-and-npr/
Other Possible Arrangement (Thanks Techboy):
1 2 3 4 5 6
- - - - - -
6 9 9 7 4 2
7 1 7 2 2 8
9 3 6 5 5 7
- - - - - -
5 1 9 2 2 5
Proof:
-Slot 2: NPR / Twoism detective workrevertedhexagon wrote:NorthcutTAmnestY wrote:@revertedhexagon: The latest string of integers could be placed in the second area out of the six we have, based on the NPR broadcast mentioning "snow" several times. In the Atalanta vid description, the word "snow" is in that slot.
@NEUROMUTE: It all makes sense now, and yeah, I am inclined to agree with you.
agree with both of you
-Slot 3: The YouTube videos (from Balloon -> csch) http://hosting.earthshine.it/~mark/3-717228.mp3
-Slot 4: The original record (lilcakey / Reddit / RSD) http://hosting.earthshine.it/~mark/4-956557.mp3
-Slot 6: The BBC Radio 1 http://hosting.earthshine.it/~mark/6-519225.mp3
Wed Apr 24, 2013 7:58 am
re-phaelam-ed wrote:Capt Kittinger wrote:Waiting on a new album, what is it that we all want to know? My bet is on release date (ie d/d/m/m/y/y), or album title, or both. The actual codes might lead us to a URL to find this info, or they may be the info itself.
Who knows.. but I personally think we're wasting our time trying to find meaning in the numbers at this stage. Everything indicates we've been drip-fed each clue/code so far, as others have theorised - it's leading up to a reveal, it's not something that can be cracked.. yet. I'm tending to the view that the codes may have something to do with a one-time pad (as others have thought), in which case we need all 6 codes plus a decryption key. IMHO!
what he said
even though discussed....im still with d/d/m/m/y/y or y/y/y/y/m/m
sometimes simpler is better.
Wed Apr 24, 2013 8:27 am
ambivalenceavenue wrote:Stoked that I woke up today to two new codes!!
Seems quite likely at this point that further codes will come from different mediums given how so far they've used vinyl, radio, and video. Would say twitter perhaps but maybe that would be too obvious.
Wed Apr 24, 2013 8:39 am
Wed Apr 24, 2013 8:50 am
long shadows wrote:ambivalenceavenue wrote:Stoked that I woke up today to two new codes!!
Seems quite likely at this point that further codes will come from different mediums given how so far they've used vinyl, radio, and video. Would say twitter perhaps but maybe that would be too obvious.
Shortwave radio perhaps? It would fit the numbers stations theme.
(I did mentioned this already in another thread, but I'm not sure where I'm supposed to be posting these things. Sorry for the duplicates).
I'm unashamedly excited about all this!
Wed Apr 24, 2013 9:26 am
Wed Apr 24, 2013 9:29 am
Quillian wrote:Quick question: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Conet_ ... sc_Edition
This article used to say "The Conet Project has since become somewhat of a cult sensation", but as of an edit dated April 24th, it now says "The Conet Project xxxxxx/------/------/------/------/------ has since become somewhat of a cult sensation" mean anything?
For reference here is the edit- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?tit ... =551931596
EDIT- Another of the IP's edits added the same sequence to this- this http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?tit ... =551931870
Wed Apr 24, 2013 9:31 am
Wed Apr 24, 2013 9:35 am
Quillian wrote:Quick question: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Conet_ ... sc_Edition
This article used to say "The Conet Project has since become somewhat of a cult sensation", but as of an edit dated April 24th, it now says "The Conet Project xxxxxx/------/------/------/------/------ has since become somewhat of a cult sensation" mean anything?
For reference here is the edit- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?tit ... =551931596
EDIT- Another of the IP's edits added the same sequence to this- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?tit ... =551931870
Wed Apr 24, 2013 9:38 am
I think this is a wiki defacement. A bit crude and obvious.Keeoaddi wrote:Quillian wrote:Quick question: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Conet_ ... sc_Edition
This article used to say "The Conet Project has since become somewhat of a cult sensation", but as of an edit dated April 24th, it now says "The Conet Project xxxxxx/------/------/------/------/------ has since become somewhat of a cult sensation" mean anything?
For reference here is the edit- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?tit ... =551931596
EDIT- Another of the IP's edits added the same sequence to this- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?tit ... =551931870
i'm leaning towards this being a red herring, but worth noting for now
Wed Apr 24, 2013 9:49 am
Wed Apr 24, 2013 10:15 am
A B C D E F
1 - - - - - - =
2 6 9 9 7 4 2 = 33
3 7 1 7 2 2 8 = 27
4 9 3 6 5 5 7 = 35
5 - - - - - - =
6 5 1 9 2 2 5 = 24
1 2 3 4 5 6
A - 6 7 9 - 5 = 27 + ?
B - 9 1 3 - 1 = 14 + ?
C - 9 7 6 - 9 = 31 + ?
D - 7 2 5 - 2 = 16 + ?
E - 4 2 5 - 2 = 13 + ?
F - 2 8 7 - 5 = 22 + ?
Wed Apr 24, 2013 10:15 am