Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:35 pm
Opothecary wrote:I don't even know what part of this post to quote.
Fri Jun 03, 2016 2:02 am
zeoevil wrote:Opothecary wrote:I don't even know what part of this post to quote.
The world was vast and unfathomable when we were kids. Now, the world is as small as a smartphone. The internet took their innocence and left them jaded and cynical before the rest of the world even had a chance to.
Fri Jun 03, 2016 2:32 am
THE BOB wrote:A dark sense of humor used to be something to toughen one up a little. We'd take jabs from above without going to war over it when I was young.
Sat Jun 04, 2016 4:33 am
zeoevil wrote:Opothecary wrote:I don't even know what part of this post to quote.
The world was vast and unfathomable when we were kids. Now, the world is as small as a smartphone. The internet took their innocence and left them jaded and cynical before the rest of the world even had a chance to.
Sun Jun 05, 2016 8:26 am
vanlorne wrote:Opothecary wrote:vanlorne wrote:And this all kind of shows how BOC really has no regards for their fans. Seriously, whats wrong with updated from them a couple times a year? Why are they so adverse to any contact with their fans? The reclusiveness and mystique is fun but its become more annoying now than anything. I mean let the quality of the music sell your records rather than relying on this over the top, and now seemingly trying too hard, mystique. Its getting kind of sad
Why are they obligated to have a relationship with you beyond their artistic output? I'd like the occasional update too, but it's not going to affect my enjoyment of their work. Millennial entitlement breaks my heart.
No one is talking about millennial entitlement A few updates here and there isn't a relationship with me or anyone else. Doesn't effect my enjoyment of the work either, I never said that it did. They clearly can and will put about as much distance between themselves and fans as they can. I'm saying that for a band who wants to sell albums, they need to have some sort of interaction with people other than themselves, otherwise why ever release anything? They want our money but want absolutely nothing more, and yeah, thats their right, but whats the harm in updates here and there? Nothing, other than to create this over the top reclusiveness to gain peoples interest it would seem. Im saying let your work sell your records, and not some allure of how mysterious they are
Sun Jun 05, 2016 8:27 am
Opothecary wrote:Techboy wrote:anyway, saying entitlement implies millennial and vice versa is very unfair even in the context of "heated internet argument".
This is my last contribution to this, it will probably be a little verbose and derail the thread, but...
I don't have a problem with them, per se, but their coming of age came during such a tidal shift in technology, and those ripples affected how music is consumed, and distributed, which then in turn affected how artists interacted with their fans. I think we all know this, but I guess it needs to be said to set the table. I personally feel like I have a foot in each generation, anyone technically minded in the 35-40 year range probably feels the same way about it. Close enough to say "I get where you're coming from" but far enough away and with enough footwork spent in the past to disagree vehemently with those types of expectations.
Anyways, I think this tidal shift and its cascading effect on the entertainment industry set up a permanent set of expectations among a certain demographic that someone 10 years older probably wouldn't relate to at all. My opinion of "entitlement" is someone else's "this is just how it is; why aren't you conforming to how people are SUPPOSED to do these things?"; I guess I've just described the seed of any given heated internet argument.
At least in terms of those types of expectations, these guys are old school. We used to go to record stores every week, socialize, bring the albums home, read the liner notes and all that. Of course, some people still do that, but it's the exception not the rule and is considered some type of quaint, hipster type ritual now. It used to be the only way, and we loved it. The artist was god and it was all somehow more special not having every move telegraphed months in advance.
I think this thread below is probably a great rorschach test. My kneejerk reaction would be "this could be a troll", someone else younger could (and probably should) look at it as an earnest but misguided request based on expectations set by other artists in social media:
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=13314
In the end, it seems asinine to be mad at someone for NOT doing something. If they had some large presence on social media, but were controversial or said things people didn't agree with, I could understand getting perturbed at them, but it's just silly to be outright mad about inaction and silence - not being told about what's going on, but that's the part of me that feels its more special to be kept at arms length. I'm happy to get your point via your music and your album art and so on.
Maybe it's mean spirited to try and paint a particular generation with such a large brush, but sometimes a spade is a spade. If you sent me back 200 years and asked me to load a musket, I couldn't do that. You could call me an incompetent future space witch, I'd be comfortable with that. It's not anyone's fault, it's just how it is.
People can now essentially shape their reality/entertainment/information intake to be as perfect as they would like it to be and of course that desire is going to spill over into other aspects of the artist/listener relationship. It can't be helped, but maybe it's something to keep in mind, at least insofar as understanding why someone else could say "Boards of Canada owes you nothing."
Sun Jun 05, 2016 9:18 am
Sun Jun 05, 2016 5:16 pm
vanlorne wrote: They want our money but want absolutely nothing more, and yeah, thats their right, but whats the harm in updates here and there? Nothing, other than to create this over the top reclusiveness to gain peoples interest it would seem. Im saying let your work sell your records, and not some allure of how mysterious they are
Sun Jun 05, 2016 6:02 pm
Sun Jun 05, 2016 7:20 pm
Opothecary wrote:At least in terms of those types of expectations, these guys are old school. We used to go to record stores every week, socialize, bring the albums home, read the liner notes and all that. Of course, some people still do that, but it's the exception not the rule and is considered some type of quaint, hipster type ritual now. It used to be the only way, and we loved it. The artist was god and it was all somehow more special not having every move telegraphed months in advance.
Sun Jun 05, 2016 9:01 pm
Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:09 pm
Wed Aug 28, 2019 12:41 am
Wed Aug 28, 2019 2:23 am