Sun Jun 02, 2013 4:32 pm
Sun Jun 02, 2013 4:35 pm
Ciaranarchy wrote:Some complete lunatics post here.
Boards of Canada aren't sacred. They are just a band. These tapes aren't the Arc of the Covenant. They're just a few cassettes.
All this "the Brothers" shit is absolutely wacko. The guys in BoC might be interested in cults, but I don't think they ever intended to start one with themselves as central figures.
No doubt they weren't best pleased when the material initially leaked, but that's because what we see as pretty good tunes they see as embarrassing juvenilia.
This is a different story. No tunes are leaking. Blushes are spared. Just one set of tapes changing hands.
It's, frankly, embarrassing how many people here are fanatically defensive of a pair of strangers who they have never met, and who, chances are, don't give a fuck anyway.
Sun Jun 02, 2013 4:53 pm
Opothecary wrote:You've been here an entire month, and on your 11th post, you've managed to set us all straight! We'd be lost without your opinion.
Sun Jun 02, 2013 5:01 pm
Sun Jun 02, 2013 5:04 pm
Ciaranarchy wrote:Opothecary wrote:You've been here an entire month, and on your 11th post, you've managed to set us all straight! We'd be lost without your opinion.
Hahah. I thought this was an open discussion forum, not the army. What rank do I need to achieve before I can freely state my opinion, sir?
Sun Jun 02, 2013 5:11 pm
Aerial Boundaries wrote:
@apriorion Nice name btw
Sun Jun 02, 2013 5:23 pm
Ciaranarchy wrote:Some complete lunatics post here.
Boards of Canada aren't sacred. They are just a band. These tapes aren't the Arc of the Covenant. They're just a few cassettes.
All this "the Brothers" shit is absolutely wacko. The guys in BoC might be interested in cults, but I don't think they ever intended to start one with themselves as central figures.
No doubt they weren't best pleased when the material initially leaked, but that's because what we see as pretty good tunes they see as embarrassing juvenilia.
This is a different story. No tunes are leaking. Blushes are spared. Just one set of tapes changing hands.
It's, frankly, embarrassing how many people here are fanatically defensive of a pair of strangers who they have never met, and who, chances are, don't give a fuck anyway.
Sun Jun 02, 2013 5:28 pm
apriorion wrote:Some people are dying right now because of easily preventable diseases, starvation, etc. At this moment, there are a lot of people with disposable income who could easily send their money to reputable organizations to prevent these horrible deaths. If that's true, then it is immoral for anyone to ever spend $500 dollars on a cassette tape. That was all I meant by my first post in this thread, before my point was distracted by someone who seems incapable of understanding what I write.
My argument is not new: it's a specific application of Peter Singer's famous line of argument: http://www.nytimes.com/library/magazine/home/19990905mag-poverty-singer.html
Here, watch this NFB interview snippet with him, if you aren't in the mood to read: http://youtu.be/ZrnzMpgISgo
I don't worship "the brothers". I just have general outrage toward immoral spending.
Sun Jun 02, 2013 5:29 pm
Aerial Boundaries wrote:He isn't telling you to stop talking, he is rebuking your comment. He has just as much right to do that as you do.
Aerial Boundaries wrote:I have been here about as long as you, and as far as I can see this place is mainly full of intelligent, balanced and rational people.
Sun Jun 02, 2013 5:37 pm
paul wrote:apriorion wrote:Some people are dying right now because of easily preventable diseases, starvation, etc. At this moment, there are a lot of people with disposable income who could easily send their money to reputable organizations to prevent these horrible deaths. If that's true, then it is immoral for anyone to ever spend $500 dollars on a cassette tape. That was all I meant by my first post in this thread, before my point was distracted by someone who seems incapable of understanding what I write.
My argument is not new: it's a specific application of Peter Singer's famous line of argument: http://www.nytimes.com/library/magazine/home/19990905mag-poverty-singer.html
Here, watch this NFB interview snippet with him, if you aren't in the mood to read: http://youtu.be/ZrnzMpgISgo
I don't worship "the brothers". I just have general outrage toward immoral spending.
godammit ... why did you do that? every time i read Peter Singer (he had the single greatest impact on my life about 20 years ago), i realize how much more i can be doing. i was planning to buy an old turntable this weekend and get into vinyl. might have to wait. i'm off to make a donation to UNICEF. thanks for the reminder apriorion ... does put things into perspective.
Sun Jun 02, 2013 6:01 pm
Sun Jun 02, 2013 6:02 pm
apriorion wrote:paul wrote:apriorion wrote:Some people are dying right now because of easily preventable diseases, starvation, etc. At this moment, there are a lot of people with disposable income who could easily send their money to reputable organizations to prevent these horrible deaths. If that's true, then it is immoral for anyone to ever spend $500 dollars on a cassette tape. That was all I meant by my first post in this thread, before my point was distracted by someone who seems incapable of understanding what I write.
My argument is not new: it's a specific application of Peter Singer's famous line of argument: http://www.nytimes.com/library/magazine/home/19990905mag-poverty-singer.html
Here, watch this NFB interview snippet with him, if you aren't in the mood to read: http://youtu.be/ZrnzMpgISgo
I don't worship "the brothers". I just have general outrage toward immoral spending.
godammit ... why did you do that? every time i read Peter Singer (he had the single greatest impact on my life about 20 years ago), i realize how much more i can be doing. i was planning to buy an old turntable this weekend and get into vinyl. might have to wait. i'm off to make a donation to UNICEF. thanks for the reminder apriorion ... does put things into perspective.
Sorry, man. Not trying to ruin anyone's day--only pointing out how some purchases are not just pragmatically unwise, but have moral weight, as well.
Sun Jun 02, 2013 6:14 pm
thedisavowed wrote:I don't understand the philosophy here:
It is morally acceptable to have illegally downloaded and enjoyed bootleg recordings of the pre-twoism tunes
HOWEVER it is offensive for someone who owns a legitimate copy to sell their copy at a profit?
Guys this is bizarre. If BoC wants to make money off the old tunes then they know what to do - sell it. Supply will exceed demand prices will drop and the money will go into the 'right' coffers.
This is all commerce and seems totally legit to me
Sun Jun 02, 2013 6:30 pm
Sun Jun 02, 2013 6:40 pm
Alzado wrote:so much hypocrisy here.
it's 100% legal to sell these tapes. what is illegal though is trading ripped bootlegs. so this really comes down to mass jealousy.
Sun Jun 02, 2013 6:41 pm
Sun Jun 02, 2013 6:45 pm
Alzado wrote:so much hypocrisy here.
it's 100% legal to sell these tapes. what is illegal though is trading ripped bootlegs. so this really comes down to mass jealousy.
Sun Jun 02, 2013 6:53 pm
Sun Jun 02, 2013 6:55 pm
Alzado wrote: