Thu Jun 02, 2016 2:54 am
drillkicker wrote:I don't know about any of you, but I'm really getting tired of this shit. Until the albums get officially released (i.e. never), I'm just going to assume they're all fake.
Thu Jun 02, 2016 4:24 am
Skimming Stone wrote:On the other hand, it starts to get annoying when you realise that people aren't just taking these uploads as nice sounding BoC fakes, but instead are willing to put their complete faith into them. Tonx is right that it should all be pretty harmless, but at the same time I do share the annoyance that others are starting to get when they see another group of twoism-ers get obviously baited. I suppose I worry that it's making twoism members look like a bunch of gullible fanatics, when there are plenty of us that are more than happy to just accept them as fake and forget their existence.
Thu Jun 02, 2016 5:55 am
tonx wrote:Cupz wrote:Aaw, sorry to hear your work got missused like this. Cool little diddle, though.
Really, twoism, can we stop acting like a bunch of retards already? Threads like this are feeding the trolls.
As the messenger being shot here (I'm responsible for a couple of these threads) let me just say, I don't really care. It's fun to take these things apart, speculate about these lost recordings, and it's all pretty fucking harmless - especially since we've been able to expose the fakes pretty quickly.
The real tracks are out there. Someone who has them is possibly reading twoism. One of these days, we will all hear them.
Thu Jun 02, 2016 6:06 am
Thu Jun 02, 2016 6:11 am
Thu Jun 02, 2016 7:54 am
dispellingafake wrote:Christ. Alright, so here's what this comes down to: It's fake. I made the track. I'm part of some shitty DIY music creators facebook group that my friend runs. I uploaded the track for feedback since I wasn't even done with it and it appears that some dickhead (honestly I suspect my friend, he was the one that told me about all of this) just stole it, cut it down, and slapped a false label on it. Someone posted a link to this thread on the youtube video comments. Figured I'd come in and clear the air.
proof: http://vocaroo.com/i/s0u32RawEGjA
Thu Jun 02, 2016 1:25 pm
tonx wrote:As the messenger being shot here (I'm responsible for a couple of these threads) let me just say, I don't really care. It's fun to take these things apart, speculate about these lost recordings, and it's all pretty fucking harmless - especially since we've been able to expose the fakes pretty quickly.
The real tracks are out there. Someone who has them is possibly reading twoism. One of these days, we will all hear them.
Thu Jun 02, 2016 3:01 pm
drillkicker wrote:Skimming Stone wrote:On the other hand, it starts to get annoying when you realise that people aren't just taking these uploads as nice sounding BoC fakes, but instead are willing to put their complete faith into them. Tonx is right that it should all be pretty harmless, but at the same time I do share the annoyance that others are starting to get when they see another group of twoism-ers get obviously baited. I suppose I worry that it's making twoism members look like a bunch of gullible fanatics, when there are plenty of us that are more than happy to just accept them as fake and forget their existence.
That doesn't really bother me, but what I can't stand is how old this cycle is getting. It's just fake after fake, and none of them ever, ever get confirmed, even if they're never debunked. It's like BoC fans are so starved of new material that we've all become addicted to finding new fakes to satisfy our cravings, but it never does because it isn't the real thing, so we just start over and find a new one to speculate over until someone comes along and spoils it. The worst part is that even if a real one does get found, no closure will come of it. Nobody will come along and confirm it for us, so it will just remain yet another mystery itching us like the rest of them. This is the biggest reason why I wish they'd just go ahead and officially release all the albums. Even if the music isn't good, it will at least be nice to have all this confusion over with so we can focus on the music itself rather than these boring old mysteries.
Thu Jun 02, 2016 3:15 pm
vanlorne wrote:And this all kind of shows how BOC really has no regards for their fans. Seriously, whats wrong with updated from them a couple times a year? Why are they so adverse to any contact with their fans? The reclusiveness and mystique is fun but its become more annoying now than anything. I mean let the quality of the music sell your records rather than relying on this over the top, and now seemingly trying too hard, mystique. Its getting kind of sad
Thu Jun 02, 2016 3:34 pm
Thu Jun 02, 2016 3:58 pm
vanlorne wrote:And this all kind of shows how BOC really has no regards for their fans. Seriously, whats wrong with updated from them a couple times a year? Why are they so adverse to any contact with their fans? The reclusiveness and mystique is fun but its become more annoying now than anything. I mean let the quality of the music sell your records rather than relying on this over the top, and now seemingly trying too hard, mystique. Its getting kind of sad
Thu Jun 02, 2016 4:21 pm
Opothecary wrote:vanlorne wrote:And this all kind of shows how BOC really has no regards for their fans. Seriously, whats wrong with updated from them a couple times a year? Why are they so adverse to any contact with their fans? The reclusiveness and mystique is fun but its become more annoying now than anything. I mean let the quality of the music sell your records rather than relying on this over the top, and now seemingly trying too hard, mystique. Its getting kind of sad
Why are they obligated to have a relationship with you beyond their artistic output? I'd like the occasional update too, but it's not going to affect my enjoyment of their work. Millennial entitlement breaks my heart.
Thu Jun 02, 2016 4:26 pm
Opothecary wrote:Millennial entitlement breaks my heart.
Thu Jun 02, 2016 4:50 pm
drillkicker wrote:Opothecary wrote:Millennial entitlement breaks my heart.
And there it is, the buzzword we were all waiting for !
Thu Jun 02, 2016 5:47 pm
Opothecary wrote:university tuition.
Thu Jun 02, 2016 6:52 pm
Techboy wrote:Opothecary wrote:university tuition.
i've got bad news for you...
anyway, saying entitlement implies millennial and vice versa is very unfair even in the context of "heated internet argument".
i think we can safely agree on: further old tunes will become available when and if the band chooses to release them, and that's all; and further information about the band's current status will not be divulged because of angry rants on internet forums. yes?
Thu Jun 02, 2016 7:07 pm
Techboy wrote:anyway, saying entitlement implies millennial and vice versa is very unfair even in the context of "heated internet argument".
Thu Jun 02, 2016 8:22 pm
vanlorne wrote:Yes, dad
Thu Jun 02, 2016 8:44 pm
Opothecary wrote:drillkicker wrote:Opothecary wrote:Millennial entitlement breaks my heart.
And there it is, the buzzword we were all waiting for !
Millennial, or entitlement? True, I guess it's redundant to say both when one always implies the other.
Thu Jun 02, 2016 10:54 pm
Opothecary wrote:
I don't have a problem with them, per se, but their coming of age came during such a tidal shift in technology, and those ripples affected how music is consumed, and distributed, which then in turn affected how artists interacted with their fans. I think we all know this, but I guess it needs to be said to set the table. I personally feel like I have a foot in each generation, anyone technically minded in the 35-40 year range probably feels the same way about it. Close enough to say "I get where you're coming from" but far enough away and with enough footwork spent in the past to disagree vehemently with those types of expectations. ...