Everything related to our favorite Scottish duo.
Post a reply

Wed Nov 11, 2009 11:21 pm

Tekmosis wrote:
polar sky wrote:Here it is:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nR7vJDNjAB4

Ok, it's being played at 33 1/3 RPM, have a listen! It is meant to be played at 45 RPM. So it slows it down when playing it at 33 1/3 RPM, the supposed original length.


I think it sounds more organic at 33 RPM but it was definitely inteded for 45 RPM IMO


yes, most definitely.

Wed Nov 11, 2009 11:37 pm

yeah, intended for 45rpm imo. though i think i might like this version better.....? *ohmagod*

its so...opiated.

:twisted:

Thu Nov 12, 2009 12:40 am

"C'est fini la comédie"
Last edited by the letter p on Thu Feb 18, 2010 7:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Thu Nov 12, 2009 1:52 am

isawdrones wrote:
Tekmosis wrote:
polar sky wrote:Here it is:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nR7vJDNjAB4

Ok, it's being played at 33 1/3 RPM, have a listen! It is meant to be played at 45 RPM. So it slows it down when playing it at 33 1/3 RPM, the supposed original length.


I think it sounds more organic at 33 RPM but it was definitely inteded for 45 RPM IMO


yes, most definitely.


I think so too, only because some parts sound really slowed down, others sound on time, meaning you can tell the bongo drums in the beginning when played at 33 1/3 sounds on time and real, but that just means they played it slow when they recorded so they could have it sped up when recording the other stuff (but now that i am listening to it again, it sounds slowed down too). I think it's original speed was to be played at 45 too. It just sounds too slow and drawn out. Oh well it was fun having something new to talk about. lol.

Thu Nov 12, 2009 3:50 am

What a load of toss. Seriously.

Thu Nov 12, 2009 1:38 pm

Blink of an eye wrote:What a load of toss. Seriously.


It's better than talking about what everyone's "Favorite BOC Album is", or "When is the new album coming out?" Threads.

Thu Nov 12, 2009 1:39 pm

polar sky wrote:
isawdrones wrote:
Tekmosis wrote:
polar sky wrote:Here it is:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nR7vJDNjAB4

Ok, it's being played at 33 1/3 RPM, have a listen! It is meant to be played at 45 RPM. So it slows it down when playing it at 33 1/3 RPM, the supposed original length.


I think it sounds more organic at 33 RPM but it was definitely inteded for 45 RPM IMO


yes, most definitely.


I think so too, only because some parts sound really slowed down, others sound on time, meaning you can tell the bongo drums in the beginning when played at 33 1/3 sounds on time and real, but that just means they played it slow when they recorded so they could have it sped up when recording the other stuff (but now that i am listening to it again, it sounds slowed down too). I think it's original speed was to be played at 45 too. It just sounds too slow and drawn out. Oh well it was fun having something new to talk about. lol.


OMFG! I've found new thing - fixing all BoC tracks under 33rpm and choose the best of them )

Thu Nov 12, 2009 4:25 pm

Patryk Ludamage wrote:
polar sky wrote:
isawdrones wrote:
Tekmosis wrote:
polar sky wrote:Here it is:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nR7vJDNjAB4

Ok, it's being played at 33 1/3 RPM, have a listen! It is meant to be played at 45 RPM. So it slows it down when playing it at 33 1/3 RPM, the supposed original length.


I think it sounds more organic at 33 RPM but it was definitely inteded for 45 RPM IMO


yes, most definitely.


I think so too, only because some parts sound really slowed down, others sound on time, meaning you can tell the bongo drums in the beginning when played at 33 1/3 sounds on time and real, but that just means they played it slow when they recorded so they could have it sped up when recording the other stuff (but now that i am listening to it again, it sounds slowed down too). I think it's original speed was to be played at 45 too. It just sounds too slow and drawn out. Oh well it was fun having something new to talk about. lol.


OMFG! I've found new thing - fixing all BoC tracks under 33rpm and choose the best of them )


Finding reversed parts and reversing them to where they sound normal sounds cool too.

Thu Nov 12, 2009 4:37 pm

Blink of an eye wrote:What a load of toss. Seriously.


what do you suggest we talk about?

Thu Nov 12, 2009 5:18 pm

Numerator wrote:
Blink of an eye wrote:What a load of toss. Seriously.


what do you suggest we talk about?
Image

Thu Nov 12, 2009 8:14 pm

Blink of an eye wrote:What a load of toss. Seriously.


I agree, this is completely baseless mystification when there is a much simpler and more likely explanation - they found some forgotten copies while routing around their archives for Warp20.

Thu Nov 12, 2009 9:58 pm

hey, i'm drunk so don't expect this to be as exact as i know you guys get.

but yesterday I stood listening to the EP a few times, playing around with both RPM and the pitch-shifter thingybob.... anyways, it kinda seemed to me - and I don't know if i really understand the logic to this, i'm not a musician - that... certain elements of the song play as they would when recorded at different speeds / pitch's. So, for example... at 33 RPM and 8+ shift it seemed to be that the sound of the drum 'Dum-dada-dum-dada-dum' that loops in the first half of the song (i think it's a Djembe) was recorded at that level... but other aspects (e.g voices) weren't, but can be found more clearly at different pitch's / speeds. (i think voices were better at -8 pitch, 33RPM).

One other thing I think I noticed... is somewhere in the last quarter of the song there's a female voice saying 'Yellow', which is the same sound clip used later on Geogaddi... fuck i was listening to the song last night but i can't remember which one, i think it was... dawn chorus. i dno.. anywyas..

someone could probably write a phd on Geogaddi tbh

-Snuf

Thu Nov 12, 2009 11:05 pm

Snufkin wrote:hey, i'm drunk so don't expect this to be as exact as i know you guys get.

but yesterday I stood listening to the EP a few times, playing around with both RPM and the pitch-shifter thingybob.... anyways, it kinda seemed to me - and I don't know if i really understand the logic to this, i'm not a musician - that... certain elements of the song play as they would when recorded at different speeds / pitch's. So, for example... at 33 RPM and 8+ shift it seemed to be that the sound of the drum 'Dum-dada-dum-dada-dum' that loops in the first half of the song (i think it's a Djembe) was recorded at that level... but other aspects (e.g voices) weren't, but can be found more clearly at different pitch's / speeds. (i think voices were better at -8 pitch, 33RPM).


Assuming I read this correctly, I'm sure that different elements of their tracks were initially recorded at different speeds and pitches. After messing around with tape, downsampling and other tricks for years, that sort of thing is bound to find its way into their music (as it does for many others).

Fri Nov 13, 2009 4:32 pm

Moebius wrote:
Blink of an eye wrote:What a load of toss. Seriously.


I agree, this is completely baseless mystification when there is a much simpler and more likely explanation - they found some forgotten copies while routing around their archives for Warp20.


Really? Did this ruin your day? Reading this thread? Who cares if it wasn't what that guy thought it was, at least it was something new to talk about instead of all the same bullshit favorite boc album threads.

Wed Nov 18, 2009 9:44 pm

I was always under the impression that they
added Magic Window to get the total playtime
of the record up to 66.06'?

Wed Nov 18, 2009 10:38 pm

whats on the cd

Wed Nov 18, 2009 11:03 pm

Then what was the point of Magic Window?

Wed Nov 18, 2009 11:37 pm

Fredd-E wrote:
Numerator wrote:
Blink of an eye wrote:What a load of toss. Seriously.


what do you suggest we talk about?
Image


this.

common surrency. spooky. very spooky.

Thu Nov 19, 2009 2:41 am

lol. boc fans

Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:32 am

yaff
Last edited by Altruizine on Fri Aug 26, 2011 5:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Post a reply