Thu Nov 19, 2009 9:42 pm
Joebot Kill wrote:are these your photos?
Thu Nov 19, 2009 9:50 pm
Patryk Ludamage wrote:Joebot Kill wrote:are these your photos?
but chalangers used others photos, or not?
Thu Nov 19, 2009 9:54 pm
polar sky wrote:Patryk Ludamage wrote:Joebot Kill wrote:are these your photos?
but chalangers used others photos, or not?
I used my own photography, got the negatives to back it up
Thu Nov 19, 2009 10:06 pm
Patryk Ludamage wrote:Lucky guy! I wish to have a good camera the some day, because i have only shitty one in my phone
Thu Nov 19, 2009 10:17 pm
Neels wrote:Patryk Ludamage wrote:Lucky guy! I wish to have a good camera the some day, because i have only shitty one in my phone
I think you don't need an expensive camera to take a great picture.. It's not that easy, but it's possible. Sometimes crappy quality can be an advantage. The grainy look perhaps fits great with the nostalgy hidden in BoC.. Try it! Your own work is worth much more than using random photos from the net.
Thu Nov 19, 2009 11:09 pm
Neels wrote:Patryk Ludamage wrote:Lucky guy! I wish to have a good camera the some day, because i have only shitty one in my phone
I think you don't need an expensive camera to take a great picture.. It's not that easy, but it's possible. Sometimes crappy quality can be an advantage. The grainy look perhaps fits great with the nostalgy hidden in BoC.. Try it! Your own work is worth much more than using random photos from the net.
Thu Nov 19, 2009 11:14 pm
polar sky wrote:Neels wrote:Patryk Ludamage wrote:Lucky guy! I wish to have a good camera the some day, because i have only shitty one in my phone
I think you don't need an expensive camera to take a great picture.. It's not that easy, but it's possible. Sometimes crappy quality can be an advantage. The grainy look perhaps fits great with the nostalgy hidden in BoC.. Try it! Your own work is worth much more than using random photos from the net.
I used a 1984 Kodak Fisher Price 110 Film Camera. And A Dollar Store Camera with expired film.
Thu Nov 19, 2009 11:15 pm
Pantheon wrote:polar sky wrote:Neels wrote:Patryk Ludamage wrote:Lucky guy! I wish to have a good camera the some day, because i have only shitty one in my phone
I think you don't need an expensive camera to take a great picture.. It's not that easy, but it's possible. Sometimes crappy quality can be an advantage. The grainy look perhaps fits great with the nostalgy hidden in BoC.. Try it! Your own work is worth much more than using random photos from the net.
I used a 1984 Kodak Fisher Price 110 Film Camera. And A Dollar Store Camera with expired film.
Looks great tho man, realy awesome.
Thu Nov 19, 2009 11:24 pm
Fri Nov 20, 2009 12:29 am
Fri Nov 20, 2009 10:27 pm
Patryk Ludamage wrote:Neels wrote:Patryk Ludamage wrote:Lucky guy! I wish to have a good camera the some day, because i have only shitty one in my phone
I think you don't need an expensive camera to take a great picture.. It's not that easy, but it's possible. Sometimes crappy quality can be an advantage. The grainy look perhaps fits great with the nostalgy hidden in BoC.. Try it! Your own work is worth much more than using random photos from the net.
Ok - i'll maybe try it![]()
I think that my works is usless and mr. Fredd-E have enough for a collection. I'll not make everyone angry with me anymore. sorry for my flood and i hope some useless posts will delete![]()
P.S. - it is my last post in this thread, sorry for long conversation
Fri Nov 20, 2009 11:13 pm
Fri Nov 20, 2009 11:18 pm
Sat Nov 21, 2009 1:09 am
Sat Nov 21, 2009 6:36 am
Pantheon wrote:Awww man, that logo is bad ass! Superb, but I think the logo you have to use had been decided. The backgrounds are awesome, reminds me of ISO50's designs.
Sat Nov 21, 2009 8:53 am
Ray wrote:Pantheon wrote:Awww man, that logo is bad ass! Superb, but I think the logo you have to use had been decided. The backgrounds are awesome, reminds me of ISO50's designs.
Ah dang! I should've read all the pages before getting into it. Newb mistake. Thanks for the props man. Gonna keep working on the backround. Cheers.
Sat Nov 21, 2009 9:38 am
Ray wrote:Pantheon wrote:Awww man, that logo is bad ass! Superb, but I think the logo you have to use had been decided. The backgrounds are awesome, reminds me of ISO50's designs.
Ah dang! I should've read all the pages before getting into it. Newb mistake. Thanks for the props man. Gonna keep working on the backround. Cheers.
Sat Nov 21, 2009 9:47 am
Joebot Kill wrote:Patryk Ludamage wrote:Neels wrote:Patryk Ludamage wrote:Lucky guy! I wish to have a good camera the some day, because i have only shitty one in my phone
I think you don't need an expensive camera to take a great picture.. It's not that easy, but it's possible. Sometimes crappy quality can be an advantage. The grainy look perhaps fits great with the nostalgy hidden in BoC.. Try it! Your own work is worth much more than using random photos from the net.
Ok - i'll maybe try it![]()
I think that my works is usless and mr. Fredd-E have enough for a collection. I'll not make everyone angry with me anymore. sorry for my flood and i hope some useless posts will delete![]()
P.S. - it is my last post in this thread, sorry for long conversation
No one is angry with you Patryk. There's no harm in submitting your ideas. We are just giving feedback!
Sat Nov 21, 2009 9:52 am
Patryk Ludamage wrote:In anyway - i just want to create for a collection one or five good banners with my previous photos.
If i'll use those logo in pds, my works will accept or in anyway i must to do something new with my own photos to get into collection?
Sat Nov 21, 2009 10:22 am
Ray wrote:
and another