The 6-number sequence as it stands

Everything related to our favorite Scottish duo.

Moderators: mdg, Mexicola, 2020k, Fredd-E, Aesthetics

New Seed
Status: Offline
Posts: 9
Joined: 25 Apr 2013
from watmm

Posted Today, 03:02 PM

I suspect the repeated digit is a carrier that indicates the following digit is the message's place in the sequence. The code, then is only the first three digits

User avatar
Posts Quantity
Status: Offline
Posts: 138
Joined: 24 Apr 2013
Location: Seattle, Washington
cfish wrote:Ok....since we haven't received any new clues since the 23rd, I'm going to share my thoughts on this thing. Hopefully it's not just incredibly wild speculation...but I'd like to see what others outside IRC think...they haven't been too receptive, but I have a feeling that will change as the length of time since the last broadcasted clue grows.

The theory:

First, the NPR clue. It broke the pattern of the clues being announced with the --/--/XX/--/--/-- track names. Why? I think it was deliberate. If it wasn't, NPR likely would have tweeted the track name, or updated the All Songs Considered site with it at some point over the last two days.

Regarding that, I think cydoniac (from the 2020k page and IRC) is correct in assuming that the NPR sequence was backwards and actually fits in the fifth slot like this:

------/------/717228/936557/247996/519225

I believe broadcasting it backwards and without a track name was intended to make us start speculating and discover the pattern...the descending digit in the ones place (8,7,6,5), and the repeating digits in the hundreds and tens places.

So, if that's the case, we can infer the following about the missing pieces...

-The first set ends in 0 or 10, and the second ends in 9
-With the repeating digits, the first set ends in either 110 (or XX0, if it's just 0,9,8,7,6,5), and the second in XX9 (X = repeating digits)

So that gives us: ---XX0/---XX9/717228/936557/247996/519225

Without the repeating digits, that leaves over 99 billion possibilities (99999 squared)

BUT, if we assume the XXs could be 11,22,33,44,55,66,77,88,99, or 00, that narrows the field considerably. There's also the (very distinct) possibility that there's some other pattern I'm missing about the first three digits.

Perhaps we could condense the list of codes to a brute-forceable quantity. Whether we use that list to search Google, a public torrent site like tpb, or elsewhere is debatable...but I think without any other information this is the general direction we should be heading in.

Music is math, right?

Or maybe I'm just frustrated and have gone off the deep end.


Yeah I am also in this camp. I think its interesting to consider the Red Moon code reversed (606001) which could extend the current matrix beyond just the 6 implied lines. I am not sure if this gives us any more info a this point though.

I just don't know enough about numbers stations or how they work to make much sense of this.

Is this some more basic matrix puzzle?

Someone on Facebook posted this as being a similar but more easily cracked code but I can't tell if its total BS or not and I am afraid to look into it too much...the number of characters is not consistent:

2ysur2/ysubic/ur2ys4m/xxxxxx/------/bocqed

New Seed
Status: Offline
Posts: 9
Joined: 25 Apr 2013
cfish wrote:-The first set ends in 0 or 10, and the second ends in 9
-With the repeating digits, the first set ends in either 110 (or XX0, if it's just 0,9,8,7,6,5), and the second in XX9 (X = repeating digits)


Not necessarily. Typical Numbers Station broadcasts begin with an indicator that the message is to begin. Sometimes the reader will say "Atención" or "Achtung" or the like, but sometimes the message begins with a number sequence denoting the beginning, perhaps a series of zeroes, or 1 2 3 4 5 6.

The first slot may, in fact, be filled with no more data than an indicator that it comes first and the sequence begins, with the message to follow.

User avatar
Friendly Stranger
Status: Offline
Posts: 27
Joined: 9 May 2006
Location: Philadelphia, PA, USA`
Douay-Rheims wrote:
cfish wrote:-The first set ends in 0 or 10, and the second ends in 9
-With the repeating digits, the first set ends in either 110 (or XX0, if it's just 0,9,8,7,6,5), and the second in XX9 (X = repeating digits)


Not necessarily. Typical Numbers Station broadcasts begin with an indicator that the message is to begin. Sometimes the reader will say "Atención" or "Achtung" or the like, but sometimes the message begins with a number sequence denoting the beginning, perhaps a series of zeroes, or 1 2 3 4 5 6.

The first slot may, in fact, be filled with no more data than an indicator that it comes first and the sequence begins, with the message to follow.


I think the message indicator is the jingle that repeats three times before the code. If you want to hear a real-world example, here's the czech lady from the Conet Project:

http://vimeo.com/musicstore/track/4971/ ... et-project

New Seed
Status: Offline
Posts: 9
Joined: 25 Apr 2013
I think the message indicator is the jingle that repeats three times before the code.


I didn't say you were wrong, in fact you're more than likely right on the above point. I was just offering another possibility, one that neatly resolves the (apparent) difficulty with the last digit.

User avatar
Boqurant
Status: Offline
Posts: 63
Joined: 23 Feb 2009
Location: Stockholm
Does anyone know why it says:

(C) 2013 WARP RECORDS LIMITED (C) 2013 WARP RECORDS LIMITED

twice on the 12 inch cover?

I find that odd.....

User avatar
Posts Quantity
Status: Offline
Posts: 116
Joined: 24 Dec 2012
Location: Scotland
its (P) and (C)

publishing and copyright.

User avatar
Boqurant
Status: Offline
Posts: 63
Joined: 23 Feb 2009
Location: Stockholm
nickb523 wrote:its (P) and (C)

publishing and copyright.



Oh, you're right. Someone should change that on the bocpages.

User avatar
Eagle Minded
Status: Offline
Posts: 407
Joined: 24 Nov 2012
Feels like a long game of hangman.

User avatar
Nova Scotia Robot
Status: Offline
Posts: 5098
Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Location: Ontario, Canada
Image

User avatar
Moderator
Status: Offline
Posts: 4445
Joined: 28 Nov 2004
Location: Belgium
Herzog wrote:
nickb523 wrote:its (P) and (C)

publishing and copyright.



Oh, you're right. Someone should change that on the bocpages.
You could do it. It's freely editable publically.

But no worries, I already did it. ;-)

User avatar
Dayvan Cowboy
Status: Offline
Posts: 1047
Joined: 3 Mar 2008
747Music wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gwZH0SCmspk&feature=player_embedded

Could this be a hint for the NPR code?


No, definite fake. Where's the hint in that anyway? Did I miss something?

User avatar
Nova Scotia Robot
Status: Offline
Posts: 5098
Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Location: Ontario, Canada
The Friendly Stranger wrote:
747Music wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gwZH0SCmspk&feature=player_embedded

Could this be a hint for the NPR code?


No, definite fake. Where's the hint in that anyway? Did I miss something?



2:15 in that video has a "------/------/------/------/xxxxxx/------"


edit: I googled the video title and the word means "shortly" or "soon".
Last edited by 747Music on Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image

User avatar
Dayvan Cowboy
Status: Offline
Posts: 1047
Joined: 3 Mar 2008
747Music wrote:
The Friendly Stranger wrote:
747Music wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gwZH0SCmspk&feature=player_embedded

Could this be a hint for the NPR code?


No, definite fake. Where's the hint in that anyway? Did I miss something?



2:15 in that video has a "------/------/------/------/xxxxxx/------"


Oh yea haha, how did I miss that?!

User avatar
Eagle Minded
Status: Offline
Posts: 330
Joined: 22 Mar 2012
747Music wrote:
The Friendly Stranger wrote:
747Music wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gwZH0SCmspk&feature=player_embedded

Could this be a hint for the NPR code?


No, definite fake. Where's the hint in that anyway? Did I miss something?



2:15 in that video has a "------/------/------/------/xxxxxx/------"


edit: I googled the video title and the word means "shortly" or "soon".


How did you get to this video?

User avatar
Nova Scotia Robot
Status: Offline
Posts: 5098
Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Location: Ontario, Canada
b0qurant wrote:
747Music wrote:
The Friendly Stranger wrote:
747Music wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gwZH0SCmspk&feature=player_embedded

Could this be a hint for the NPR code?


No, definite fake. Where's the hint in that anyway? Did I miss something?



2:15 in that video has a "------/------/------/------/xxxxxx/------"


edit: I googled the video title and the word means "shortly" or "soon".


How did you get to this video?


It was posted in a comment on the Julie and Candy video.
Image

User avatar
Eagle Minded
Status: Offline
Posts: 330
Joined: 22 Mar 2012
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm...

We should wait a bit and see what happens. I wouldn't be surprised if that is real, but I also wouldn't be surprised if it is not.

User avatar
Sherbet Head
Status: Offline
Posts: 550
Joined: 6 Jun 2012
Location: Ireland
I don't believe this one to be authentic lads, it just doesn't sound legit to me at all. And I could be wrong of course. The pic also definitely looks a bit cheap for BoC in my opinion.

User avatar
Dayvan Cowboy
Status: Offline
Posts: 1047
Joined: 3 Mar 2008
DaveJ wrote:I don't believe this one to be authentic lads, it just doesn't sound legit to me at all. And I could be wrong of course. The pic also definitely looks a bit cheap for BoC in my opinion.


This x10

User avatar
Nova Scotia Robot
Status: Offline
Posts: 5098
Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Location: Ontario, Canada
It looks like it's in the official BoC youtube account playlist.


edit: or is it that the comment is from a video that is from the official BoC youtube account playlist?....
Last edited by 747Music on Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image

PreviousNext

Return to Boards of Canada

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 215 guests