Moderators: mdg, Mexicola, 2020k, Fredd-E, Aesthetics
rubot wrote:I'll never understand the Campfire Headphase 'disappointing' opinions, but to each their own.
kid wrote:rubot wrote:I'll never understand the Campfire Headphase 'disappointing' opinions, but to each their own.
it's like this for me. i imagine the campfire headphase as a stunningly attractive person...but you look at them and realise there's absolutely nothing going on behind those pretty eyes.
kid wrote:rubot wrote:I'll never understand the Campfire Headphase 'disappointing' opinions, but to each their own.
it's like this for me. i imagine the campfire headphase as a stunningly attractive person...but you look at them and realise there's absolutely nothing going on behind those pretty eyes.
headphase is full of lush beautiful sounds and well put together, but there's just no depth to it, nothing else going on behind its attractive outward veneer..
PlatrixECV wrote:It's the Monet of BoC albums in other words when they usually put out Turners.
Aimo wrote:
Has Mike got a bit of mullet action going on here??
b0qurant wrote:Aimo wrote:
Has Mike got a bit of mullet action going on here??
They kind of look like twins in this picture.
Aimo wrote:
Has Mike got a bit of mullet action going on here??
b0qurant wrote:They kind of look like twins in this picture.
"Nobody really wants to accept that we're just a colony of organisms hurtling through a void on a ball of rock."
Aimo wrote:Great interview - loved reading it this evening, and already it gives a whole other angle at which to take the album.
Also, the Guardian have their Tomorrow's Harvest review up - plus a new pic!!
http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2013/jun/06/boards-canada-tomorrows-harvest-review
Aimo wrote:
Has Mike got a bit of mullet action going on here??
thinkdontpray wrote:I'm not saying that I'm onto something here or that this is the "right" order but I really think everyone should listen to the album with the tracks in this order
1,17,2,16,3,15,4,14,5,13,6,12,7,11,8,10,9
It actually flows really well....absurdedly well IMO but I'd like to hear what you guys think. Not that there is anything wrong with the original track order at all but some of the transitions are a bit jarring and in my order it's not at all the case
Like I said though I'm not implying these tracks are paired up to their sister tracks but its interesting to say the least.
6992628 wrote:thinkdontpray wrote:I'm not saying that I'm onto something here or that this is the "right" order but I really think everyone should listen to the album with the tracks in this order
1,17,2,16,3,15,4,14,5,13,6,12,7,11,8,10,9
It actually flows really well....absurdedly well IMO but I'd like to hear what you guys think. Not that there is anything wrong with the original track order at all but some of the transitions are a bit jarring and in my order it's not at all the case
Like I said though I'm not implying these tracks are paired up to their sister tracks but its interesting to say the least.
ahhhhaaa, I see what you're up to Mr. Fibonacci this is one of the handful of groups where this would make sense to give a try
ryetronics wrote:Ender wrote:MindElevation wrote:... I love that bit about them spending a lot of time and traveling long distances just for one effect unit that contributed 1 second of audio to Cold Earth.
And if I were to guess, that sound occurs at 01:54 in the track. Thoughts anyone?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests