Sat Jun 15, 2019 2:14 pm
♄ope keeper wrote:I'm dreaming for a BOC meeting fans session somewhere by a June fireflies-filled forest - sweet listening party, sitting around a campfire and hanging out till sunset...
Sat Jun 15, 2019 3:47 pm
Sat Jun 15, 2019 4:10 pm
Sat Jun 15, 2019 4:23 pm
Sat Jun 15, 2019 4:31 pm
♄ope keeper wrote:Btw. the event starts when Sun goes from Gemini zodiac sign (Marcus) to Cancer (Mike), almost exactly in the middle between their birthdays (27 May and 14 July)...
Sat Jun 15, 2019 4:48 pm
Sat Jun 15, 2019 5:06 pm
Sat Jun 15, 2019 6:36 pm
Sat Jun 15, 2019 6:45 pm
TheStatPow wrote:Just had this little epiphany. I realised that although I was this huge BoC fan, I had never listened to Tomorrow's Harvest in one sitting.
While listening to Transmisiones Ferox I realised the girl is saying 2019. She goes "twenty nine twenty nine twenty twenty nine nine teen twenty-nine twenty-nine nineteen nineteen nineteen nineteen" and so on.
Is it possible that we had right in front of us the year of release of the next album right in front of us the whole time?
Kinda weird considering that Cosecha Transmisiones Told us the release of TH, it would make sense for Transmissiones Ferox to tell us the release of the next album.
Or maybe im going mad as always
Sat Jun 15, 2019 6:50 pm
Valotonin wrote:TheStatPow wrote:Just had this little epiphany. I realised that although I was this huge BoC fan, I had never listened to Tomorrow's Harvest in one sitting.
While listening to Transmisiones Ferox I realised the girl is saying 2019. She goes "twenty nine twenty nine twenty twenty nine nine teen twenty-nine twenty-nine nineteen nineteen nineteen nineteen" and so on.
Is it possible that we had right in front of us the year of release of the next album right in front of us the whole time?
Kinda weird considering that Cosecha Transmisiones Told us the release of TH, it would make sense for Transmissiones Ferox to tell us the release of the next album.
Or maybe im going mad as always
I had always heard it as "1995" or "1999" being repeated by a tape delay (or something akin)
It would be interesting if it was 2019, though, very interesting.
Sat Jun 15, 2019 7:05 pm
TheStatPow wrote:I retook a few listen, and you can hear it Clear as day that the word "twenty" is at least uttered
Heres a repeated clip I made to highlight it
https://clyp.it/hwmq1isa
Sat Jun 15, 2019 7:31 pm
I recently recorded TH to reel to reel and noticed that a few of the “subliminal samples” seemed to “pop-out” more.... especially that 19xx sample.... On my tape you can clearly hear what she is saying.... “1999”.... and it gets said with a slight shift in cadence/delay shift when the vocal loop repeats... hence why it sounds like it says two different things.... most likely it was in reference to some major event that occured globally or politically somewhere in that year.... I will post a clip sometime soon or even my entire tape rip of that album.... definitely has a different feel on tapeValotonin wrote:TheStatPow wrote:Just had this little epiphany. I realised that although I was this huge BoC fan, I had never listened to Tomorrow's Harvest in one sitting.
While listening to Transmisiones Ferox I realised the girl is saying 2019. She goes "twenty nine twenty nine twenty twenty nine nine teen twenty-nine twenty-nine nineteen nineteen nineteen nineteen" and so on.
Is it possible that we had right in front of us the year of release of the next album right in front of us the whole time?
Kinda weird considering that Cosecha Transmisiones Told us the release of TH, it would make sense for Transmissiones Ferox to tell us the release of the next album.
Or maybe im going mad as always
I had always heard it as "1995" or "1999" being repeated by a tape delay (or something akin)
It would be interesting if it was 2019, though, very interesting.
Sat Jun 15, 2019 7:33 pm
on my tape rip... it is more clear and pops out.... it says 1999TheStatPow wrote:Valotonin wrote:TheStatPow wrote:Just had this little epiphany. I realised that although I was this huge BoC fan, I had never listened to Tomorrow's Harvest in one sitting.
While listening to Transmisiones Ferox I realised the girl is saying 2019. She goes "twenty nine twenty nine twenty twenty nine nine teen twenty-nine twenty-nine nineteen nineteen nineteen nineteen" and so on.
Is it possible that we had right in front of us the year of release of the next album right in front of us the whole time?
Kinda weird considering that Cosecha Transmisiones Told us the release of TH, it would make sense for Transmissiones Ferox to tell us the release of the next album.
Or maybe im going mad as always
I had always heard it as "1995" or "1999" being repeated by a tape delay (or something akin)
It would be interesting if it was 2019, though, very interesting.
I retook a few listen, and you can hear it Clear as day that the word "twenty" is at least uttered
Heres a repeated clip I made to highlight it
https://clyp.it/hwmq1isa
Sat Jun 15, 2019 7:49 pm
Sat Jun 15, 2019 8:53 pm
yes exactly... imho the tape medium can better output the actual analog field that we as humans actually perceive.... in my understanding it is the difference from a diode and circuit (digital) replicating an analog waveform to an electron (tape) physcially/“energetically” aligned with an actual peak and dip from a waveform in physical space and time as being the reason that tape can sometimes “pull” hidden nuances that are harder to perceive in the digital format.... same thing happened to me when I recorded “Darkside of the Moon” by Pink Floyd onto 1/4” reel to reel.... I am saving up for a 2” all tube Ampex studio reel to reel soon and am curious if the thicker tape width will add anything due to expanded headroom and noise shelfValotonin wrote:I am personally still convinced that it is 1995 or 1999 as I have a vinyl rip in a fairly decent format, but I have listened with my studio headphones more often than not and am torn between 1995 and 1999. Five and nine are fairly interchangable given the type of sample.
I hadn't been able to hear anything remotely resembling twenty until playing that clip a few times, it sounds like it is saying "Twenty two" repeatedly which is weird seeing as, in the full track it is clearly a 199-9/5 and I can't hear anything else. It might be an effect of the vocals and some of the background sounds for that particular section. Probably unintended, but interesting.
I get what Soul_Slip is getting at, though. sometimes the individual nuances of a particular format or machine (even if the source was originally digital) can bring out elements of a track that were previously more buried in a digital format. There are some samples that I was only able to make out previously on my cassette rips. I have never recorded any BoC to my 1/4" reels, though. Maybe I should as it sounds like you get a lot of positive listening out of it.
Sun Jun 16, 2019 4:42 am
Soul_Slip wrote:yes exactly... imho the tape medium can better output the actual analog field that we as humans actually perceive.... in my understanding it is the difference from a diode and circuit (digital) replicating an analog waveform to an electron (tape) physcially/“energetically” aligned with an actual peak and dip from a waveform in physical space and time as being the reason that tape can sometimes “pull” hidden nuances that are harder to perceive in the digital format.... same thing happened to me when I recorded “Darkside of the Moon” by Pink Floyd onto 1/4” reel to reel.... I am saving up for a 2” all tube Ampex studio reel to reel soon and am curious if the thicker tape width will add anything due to expanded headroom and noise shelfValotonin wrote:I am personally still convinced that it is 1995 or 1999 as I have a vinyl rip in a fairly decent format, but I have listened with my studio headphones more often than not and am torn between 1995 and 1999. Five and nine are fairly interchangable given the type of sample.
I hadn't been able to hear anything remotely resembling twenty until playing that clip a few times, it sounds like it is saying "Twenty two" repeatedly which is weird seeing as, in the full track it is clearly a 199-9/5 and I can't hear anything else. It might be an effect of the vocals and some of the background sounds for that particular section. Probably unintended, but interesting.
I get what Soul_Slip is getting at, though. sometimes the individual nuances of a particular format or machine (even if the source was originally digital) can bring out elements of a track that were previously more buried in a digital format. There are some samples that I was only able to make out previously on my cassette rips. I have never recorded any BoC to my 1/4" reels, though. Maybe I should as it sounds like you get a lot of positive listening out of it.
Sun Jun 16, 2019 5:03 am
ParticleGhost wrote:2" Tube based Tape Machines don't exist, unfortunately
Sun Jun 16, 2019 5:08 am
Sun Jun 16, 2019 6:39 am
Sun Jun 16, 2019 7:13 am
Valotonin wrote:"In 1967 Ampex built its first prototype 16-track professional audio recorder at the request of Mirasound Studios in New York City. This machine used reels of 2-inch tape on a modified tape transport system originally built for video recording."
If that was '67, it would have likely been tube/valve based.