Moderators: Mexicola, 2020k, Fredd-E, Aesthetics
mdg wrote:a quick dig suggests this is the culprit:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czSHpQl47J8
Mexicola wrote:Interesting side-discussion:
Anyone noticed that 'Chameleon-gate' has been debunked here, on the BOCTransmission Twitter site, and via their Facebook page..... but nothing appears on the boardsofcanada.com website?
I'm not suggesting this isn't bonefide info, only that I'm wondering how 'maintained' the website is now?
Brainchops wrote:Boards of Canada - "Chameleon" :: This video was uploaded to YouTube In October of 2009 by MrWhitelabel, and as you can see by reading a majority of the user comments, it was widely dismissed as just another BoC copycat track. However, the very same track appears to have been released October 28th, 2010 on iTunes by Boards of Canada's music label Music70. Adding to the intrigue, the Boards of Canada's official YouTube channel left a comment on the above video's page approximately 2 hours ago with the following message:
"diet coke green screen failure"
A_Northern_Soul wrote:I know - that's two Facebook posts in just a few hours. Busy times at BoC-Towers
Cupz wrote:I doubt boards of canada use Dblue glitch...
Ignaz wrote:Cupz wrote:I doubt boards of canada use Dblue glitch...
I always thought dblue glitch was their secret weapon.
Fredd-E wrote:First of all I don't get it how some people say this does not resemble boc at all. Weird!
It does sound an awful lot like boc to me. Else I've been listening a totally different BoC than all of you.
It just sounds different I agree. More digital, more uptempo. Also more prominent key elements like the child vocals.
But what really baffles me is how it can be uploaded to iTunes just like that under the moniker of Boards of Canada. I've read a little bit of how to get your own music on iTunes on this link: http://homerecording.about.com/od/dupli ... iTunes.htm
The last paragraph seems to me the thing that happened here:Another great option is a company called Tunecore. Tunecore offers similar features to CD Baby, although they only deal in digital distribution. Their pricing model is quite different; Tunecore's pricing is based on whether it's a single -- which costs $9.99 to upload -- or a full album. You can either do unlimited songs and all 19 stores for $46.99, or choose your stores and songs for an additional fee. You'll go live on iTunes worldwide, eMusic, and many others. They also don't make any claim to your material, just distribute it. They offer free UPC code generation, and can hook you up with a good artwork person if you don't have cover art already made.
So basically for little to no money you can have your music uploaded to iTunes by using a service like CD Baby or the above Tunecore. But how on earth it is possible to use an already registered name without Apple not verifying this at all is beyond me. I thought iTunes being a big worldwide service would be a little bit better in quality control... it's not like it's some sort of cheap ass website....
Is anyone here more experienced in the whole iTunes business model? Please elaborate then as I'm curious to know.
turquoise70 wrote: In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if Moodgadget isn't getting any money off this either.
In short, I'm a disgruntled musician and the world of digital music distribution is officially the Wild West of our times. And not the glorified, romanticized Wild West, either - the one with all the Cholera and Horse Shit.
rolypablo wrote:which was a poor show from him.
rolypablo wrote:I am staying positive. I haven't been one of the ones who have been rude or spiteful... I just said that perhaps he could have mentioned something about the album, maybe he's been told not to mention it. That's fine, maybe he doesn't know when it will be.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 47 guests