Tue Feb 07, 2012 3:36 pm
Cupz wrote:polar sky wrote:Hope I'm not annoying anyone by making a bunch of these, but the more the better.
IMAGES
I absolutely LOOOVE they way the pentagon impacts me as some sort of titan.
BUT...
I think the picture should be something more...meaningful. Don't get me wrong, I love the soul you put in your photography, but I feel a sunset with trees is a little to broad for a compilation that is driven/inspired by certain themes. Maybe expand a little more on that OR get that pentagram integrated more with the scenery somehow, so it becomes the driving force of the scenery?
Also I think the noise outer glow for the pentagram should look less like Photoshop wants it to look like.
Typography is very well executed but feels a little safe. You used a similar layout for the back-cover before.
I couldn't have done it better though, so don't think I mean anything like that
I really like it. Just some pointers on what I would want from this compilation I guess.
Tue Feb 07, 2012 4:40 pm
Tue Feb 07, 2012 5:17 pm
Tue Feb 07, 2012 7:26 pm
Tue Feb 07, 2012 7:35 pm
Tue Feb 07, 2012 8:20 pm
mechanismj wrote:Polar Sky! Number 3!!!! YOU HAVE A WINNER! It's beautiful!
However, you should make the back panel more reflective of the front. Get some of that pinkish sun color in there!
Tue Feb 07, 2012 8:27 pm
polar sky wrote:mechanismj wrote:Polar Sky! Number 3!!!! YOU HAVE A WINNER! It's beautiful!
However, you should make the back panel more reflective of the front. Get some of that pinkish sun color in there!
I did make the back have more pink. Refresh your page. Thanks.
Sat Feb 11, 2012 6:39 am
polar sky wrote:
Mon Feb 13, 2012 7:05 am
Mon Feb 13, 2012 7:08 am
Thu Feb 16, 2012 3:46 pm
Thu Feb 16, 2012 6:51 pm
Thu Feb 16, 2012 10:03 pm
Aesthetics wrote:The release will most likely be around April/May. I really need this time to figure out what the best flow will be.
I'm still at the beginning stage. So far I don't even have one decent pair of tracks mixed into each other so I have a looooooong way to go.
What's more important now is to have someone who can build a site. The artwork is coming along nice though.
Thu Feb 16, 2012 10:57 pm
Thu Feb 16, 2012 11:54 pm
Fri Feb 17, 2012 12:17 am
Aesthetics wrote:It certainly isn't easy. There are more than 3 hours of tracks to choose from. First I have to learn the tracks by listening them through and through. Then the matching part starts where I have to form couples and try to combine them later on.
I'm also striving for a mix which doesn't have much temposhifting and songs that haven't been cut-up too much. Unfortunately I only have a couple of hours in a week to work on it and I have to be in the right mood as well.
Fri Feb 17, 2012 9:42 am
KDRUM wrote:why not jus put the best tracks on a comp unmixed?
Fri Feb 17, 2012 10:11 am
Aesthetics wrote:What's more important now is to have someone who can build a site. The artwork is coming along nice though.
Fri Feb 17, 2012 10:46 am
Isn't this what everyone does already? It would be nice as a back-up plan as it is very easy to put up a bandcamp page and it looks decent right away. But let's try to get on with this unique microsite tradition.Cryabetes wrote:So for site design, you'd want more than just a typical bandcamp account, yeah?
Cupz wrote:I can give it a shot, but I'm not a graphic artist. I do know flash like the back of my hand. Anyone with a sharp eye for graphics wanna help?
rik0000 wrote:If one of the designers can come up with a site design (with all details figured out), I don't mind turning it in a website. A photoshop file or even a high quality jpg/png as a source works for me, as long as I only have to cut it up...
Fri Feb 17, 2012 10:47 am
Aesthetics wrote:KDRUM wrote:why not jus put the best tracks on a comp unmixed?
What's the problem? You only submitted a track and don't take any participation in this community whatsoever, yet you question the whole concept. This mixed compilation series is called One on Twoism for a reason, and this is how it developed. There is no hurry to finish this.