Wed Nov 28, 2007 10:49 am
I like the font and location too. I'm satisfied the way it is but I wouldn't mind to see some variation in location.
Wed Nov 28, 2007 2:22 pm
ok
will post later today.
will post later today.
Fri Nov 30, 2007 10:42 am
not sure whether everything has been confirmed and finalised, but the font doesn't look well, to be honest. the photographs are great, but arial rounded does not suit. they need to be dirtier. maybe hand write the names and scan them in. then maybe use white as a colour overlay?
Fri Nov 30, 2007 11:23 am
A suggestion: For those who think it can be done even better. Download the photo without the text/font on the other page and DIY to show how you feel it should be. What about it polar?
lol at ross's avatar
lol at ross's avatar
Fri Nov 30, 2007 12:43 pm
can't see that without a myspace account, put it on photobucket or something
Fri Nov 30, 2007 12:49 pm
Fri Nov 30, 2007 2:11 pm
ross adey wrote:
Top tape mark looks good, bottom one doesn't. looks too digital. But the top one looks good.
Fri Nov 30, 2007 2:30 pm
yeah, you're probably right. i think where the type is positioned is better though, no?
Fri Nov 30, 2007 2:55 pm
ross adey wrote:yeah, you're probably right. i think where the type is positioned is better though, no?
yes!
Fri Nov 30, 2007 2:58 pm
okay here is some more font ideas!
Fri Nov 30, 2007 3:01 pm
the 5th one. without a doubt! x
Fri Nov 30, 2007 3:06 pm
yeah, i like the 5th one too. I also like the third one a lot, but part of me thinks it would look kinda samey considering the text is lined up with the photo compostion on the tracklist as well. hmm.
Fri Nov 30, 2007 3:10 pm
i like the third one. if the 'vol.2' was reduced it would be nice. the soft focus suits the image.
Fri Nov 30, 2007 3:11 pm
or do they match?
Fri Nov 30, 2007 3:15 pm
Hierarchy man, hierarchy. the 'One On Twoism' should be a larger, or more prominent than the 'Vol.2'. simple, but always effective.
Fri Nov 30, 2007 3:16 pm
ross adey wrote:i like the third one. if the 'vol.2' was reduced it would be nice. the soft focus suits the image.
shit, i meant to say the 4th one.
Fri Nov 30, 2007 3:20 pm
My vote is for the sixth one, the text is softer and a little more obscure, which to my eye matches the feel of the pic.
Whatever everyone decides - please, please don't put the text over the little girl's face. It's the focus of the whole deal... keep it pure!
IMO
Whatever everyone decides - please, please don't put the text over the little girl's face. It's the focus of the whole deal... keep it pure!
IMO
Fri Nov 30, 2007 3:24 pm
ArtOfTheGroove wrote:Whatever everyone decides - please, please don't put the text over the little girl's face. It's the focus of the whole deal... keep it pure!
IMO
i'm not entirely sure that matters, to be honest. the emotion is still palpable enough. why not just use the image with no text at all?!?!?!? just have the name in the sleeve notes?
edit: i really, really like the 4th one. if the vol.2 was reduced in size about 50%. can't anyone else see that?
Fri Nov 30, 2007 3:30 pm
i'm not entirely sure that matters, to be honest. the emotion is still palpable enough. why not just use the image with no text at all?!?!?!? just have the name in the sleeve notes?
Yeah, could be cool...
Whenever I look at any of the ones with the text over the face it looks very cluttered, the face is where all of the detail is - it's a pure, innocent face... let it glow!
Last edited by ArtOfTheGroove on Fri Nov 30, 2007 11:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.