Sun May 08, 2011 3:37 pm
the letter p wrote:A Balloon wrote:I am just stunned at all of this! Partly because I have an obsession with vinyl, and i became a huge fan of BoC in their late stages(because of my age), it'll be hard to acquire all of those vinyls you got there. But like Polar Sky, I don't really want the remixes and things like that.
Is that A Few Old Tunes i see in the corner???
you DO want the remixes.
surfaise, pin skeeling, prime audio soup are freakin amazing.
prime audio is such an awesome remix....oh man the subs!
Sun May 08, 2011 6:45 pm
The cassette clearly is AFOT ( Maybe a real one too?). You can make yourself easily a nice AFOT cassette too if you want to! And yeah, BoC-remixes kick some major ass. Get em!A Balloon wrote:the letter p wrote:A Balloon wrote:I am just stunned at all of this! Partly because I have an obsession with vinyl, and i became a huge fan of BoC in their late stages(because of my age), it'll be hard to acquire all of those vinyls you got there. But like Polar Sky, I don't really want the remixes and things like that.
Is that A Few Old Tunes i see in the corner???
you DO want the remixes.
surfaise, pin skeeling, prime audio soup are freakin amazing.
prime audio is such an awesome remix....oh man the subs!
...you have a few old tunes?
Mon Jun 06, 2011 6:50 pm
Mon Jun 06, 2011 7:24 pm
Mon Jun 06, 2011 9:10 pm
noby wrote:Those were dirt cheap. My local store has a couple of boc cd's and they are all about 20€.
E: oh, used, well that explains it a bit
Mon Jun 06, 2011 9:14 pm
krs wrote:noby wrote:Those were dirt cheap. My local store has a couple of boc cd's and they are all about 20€.
E: oh, used, well that explains it a bit
Yes, but they were in perfect condition. It was a good luck day.
Mon Jun 06, 2011 11:43 pm
Tue Jun 07, 2011 10:46 am
Tue Jun 07, 2011 11:02 am
Rodheh wrote:I don't want some record company to take any of their well deserved money. This is the reason I don't buy official releases from any non-independent artist, because record companies are scum that are ruining music.
Tue Jun 07, 2011 12:40 pm
noby wrote:Rodheh wrote:I don't want some record company to take any of their well deserved money. This is the reason I don't buy official releases from any non-independent artist, because record companies are scum that are ruining music.
It's just the "big four" that are ruining music. There are plenty of really good independent labels like Warp, Ed Banger, Kranky, Fonal Records, Constellation, Ninja Tune Skam, Mo Wax, Morr Music, FatCat, Orange Twins, Stones Throw, Planet Mu, Compost Records, just to name a few of my favorites. To be honest I more than happy to support the label as well, sometimes even more than the artists themselves.
Plus even though I am one, I think 99% of indenendently released music is pure crap.
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cQQJ0jjcYUE&feature=player_detailpage#t=335s)
Tue Jun 07, 2011 2:26 pm
Rodheh wrote:I disagree, but I respect your opinion.
Simply because, in my opinion no matter how "fair" labels are, I honestly believe that promoting music, which is supposed to be ART shouldn't be a business deal and the "producers", "publishers", etc. shouldn't get a cut of the money that I personally think should be on a donation basis in the first place.
I'd support a "music collective" of course, in fact I've worked with some, mostly online groups of artists that band together and promote each other's music via the website or samplers. The fact is though that the music made by those artists is usually completely free or "name your own price", which honestly are the only forms I think art, emotion invoking collected energy, should be sold for.
Not too many people know about my music, but even if I were to somehow become completely famous overnight, I'd still release my music for free with at most a little "donate via PayPal" button at the top of my page. I guess I might be one of the few people out there who doesn't see artistic endeavors as a primary career option.
There are some independent artists who whore out their music as well, although less prominent. Anyone who wants to charge album prices for some copies of 128kbps MP3's online is a cocksucker, regardless of their job and affiliation.
Tue Jun 07, 2011 3:55 pm
noby wrote:Rodheh wrote:I disagree, but I respect your opinion.
Simply because, in my opinion no matter how "fair" labels are, I honestly believe that promoting music, which is supposed to be ART shouldn't be a business deal and the "producers", "publishers", etc. shouldn't get a cut of the money that I personally think should be on a donation basis in the first place.
I'd support a "music collective" of course, in fact I've worked with some, mostly online groups of artists that band together and promote each other's music via the website or samplers. The fact is though that the music made by those artists is usually completely free or "name your own price", which honestly are the only forms I think art, emotion invoking collected energy, should be sold for.
Not too many people know about my music, but even if I were to somehow become completely famous overnight, I'd still release my music for free with at most a little "donate via PayPal" button at the top of my page. I guess I might be one of the few people out there who doesn't see artistic endeavors as a primary career option.
There are some independent artists who whore out their music as well, although less prominent. Anyone who wants to charge album prices for some copies of 128kbps MP3's online is a cocksucker, regardless of their job and affiliation.
I can totally understand where you're coming from, I used to think the same exact way like two years ago or so. I even wrote an essay on the subject for a class.
The reason we disagree is that I don't think most music is really art, per se. Hell, I don't even really consider BoC's music to be art, though I'd say BoC comes pretty close. I agree that art shouldn't be marketed are done business with. But I don't everything needs to be art, it for me doesn't make it any less valuable or unenjoyable if it isn't.
The main problem with that way of thinking for me is that it is a pipe dream and that it only works over the internet. I love buying physical copies of albums, especially on vinyl. That wouldn't really be possible in that system, would it? Physical copies would have to cost some ammount as producing them isn't free.
With that said, of course I respect your opinion too, even though I do think it's a bit naive. But if that's what you're willing to fight for then all the luck to you
Wed Jun 08, 2011 3:11 am
Mon Jun 13, 2011 12:33 am
Mon Jun 13, 2011 9:15 am
Yellow Records wrote:I want to order Twoism on CD but I have a few questions first:
1 - Where should I order it from?
2 - In addition, I want the version that is a black CD.
3 - I also want the sticker that comes with it.
4 - If i order it from BLEEP, would I get all of my wishes?
Thank you in advance!
Mon Jun 13, 2011 9:58 am
Yellow Records wrote:I want to order Twoism on CD but I have a few questions first:
1 - Where should I order it from?
2 - In addition, I want the version that is a black CD.
3 - I also want the sticker that comes with it.
4 - If i order it from BLEEP, would I get all of my wishes?
Thank you in advance!
Mon Jun 13, 2011 10:11 am
Thu Jun 16, 2011 2:45 am
Thu Jun 16, 2011 6:57 am