Everything related to our favorite Scottish duo.
Post a reply

Wed Apr 24, 2013 9:06 pm

Distant Nebulus wrote:
vanlorne wrote:recently on WATMM:

Posted Today, 12:54 PM
I looked on the twoism forum for the first time to guage the levels of hysteria and there are some people there who think that there will be a BoC transmission saying six numbers on the advert breaks between The 10 O'Clock Show on Channel 4 tonight despite having no evidence that it will happen. They want to believe and they're all going to watch it.


you wanna know whats pathetic? the fact that there is some sort of "beef" between the two forums...where did this come from, how did it start?


Ha! I ALWAYS watch it. And it's a theory not something I believe will happen.

Eh, I moved from WATMM because it's just silly over there. They look down on Twoism and we look down on them. It's just a different attitude on each forum.

Wed Apr 24, 2013 9:16 pm

BunnyRabbit wrote:
Distant Nebulus wrote:
vanlorne wrote:recently on WATMM:

Posted Today, 12:54 PM
I looked on the twoism forum for the first time to guage the levels of hysteria and there are some people there who think that there will be a BoC transmission saying six numbers on the advert breaks between The 10 O'Clock Show on Channel 4 tonight despite having no evidence that it will happen. They want to believe and they're all going to watch it.


you wanna know whats pathetic? the fact that there is some sort of "beef" between the two forums...where did this come from, how did it start?


Ha! I ALWAYS watch it. And it's a theory not something I believe will happen.

Eh, I moved from WATMM because it's just silly over there. They look down on Twoism and we look down on them. It's just a different attitude on each forum.


I think they have more of a problem with Twoism people to be honest, I don't see a lot of people badmouthing WATMM here, but I see a fair bit of "twoism-bashing" going on over at WATMM. But I don't like it there anyway, guys talk a lot of shite in fairness (aware that sounds biased) so wouldn't bother me anyway. I don't look down on them in any way, just prefer to have an actual conversation with people rather than just constantly pulling the piss, but I do enjoy both of course ;)

Wed Apr 24, 2013 9:36 pm

All true. The constant Lolz can be fun but also tiring.

I'm not even watching it now. I've been brow-beaten into bed by my pregnant partner :) to be fair i am tired.

Let me know, yeah? I'm recording in HD anyway.

Wed Apr 24, 2013 9:37 pm

DaveJ wrote:
BunnyRabbit wrote:
Distant Nebulus wrote:
vanlorne wrote:recently on WATMM:

Posted Today, 12:54 PM
I looked on the twoism forum for the first time to guage the levels of hysteria and there are some people there who think that there will be a BoC transmission saying six numbers on the advert breaks between The 10 O'Clock Show on Channel 4 tonight despite having no evidence that it will happen. They want to believe and they're all going to watch it.


you wanna know whats pathetic? the fact that there is some sort of "beef" between the two forums...where did this come from, how did it start?


Ha! I ALWAYS watch it. And it's a theory not something I believe will happen.

Eh, I moved from WATMM because it's just silly over there. They look down on Twoism and we look down on them. It's just a different attitude on each forum.


I think they have more of a problem with Twoism people to be honest, I don't see a lot of people badmouthing WATMM here, but I see a fair bit of "twoism-bashing" going on over at WATMM. But I don't like it there anyway, guys talk a lot of shite in fairness (aware that sounds biased) so wouldn't bother me anyway. I don't look down on them in any way, just prefer to have an actual conversation with people rather than just constantly pulling the piss, but I do enjoy both of course ;)


WATMM is a giant circle jerk. You're either 'in the crew' or not and if not they just fucking bash you the whole time. Not very welcoming...

Wed Apr 24, 2013 9:39 pm

On topic guys, we know what WATMM really is ;) I think everyone knows too.

Wed Apr 24, 2013 9:39 pm

krs wrote:WATMM is a giant circle jerk. You're either 'in the crew' or not and if not they just fucking bash you the whole time. Not very welcoming...
The Internet.

Wed Apr 24, 2013 9:40 pm

GRIM.657 wrote:
krs wrote:WATMM is a giant circle jerk. You're either 'in the crew' or not and if not they just fucking bash you the whole time. Not very welcoming...
The Internet.



False, twoism has never been unwelcoming to newcomers.

edit: REGARDLESS, back on topic.

Wed Apr 24, 2013 10:14 pm

Came here to post this:
Image


krs wrote:
GRIM.657 wrote:
krs wrote:WATMM is a giant circle jerk. You're either 'in the crew' or not and if not they just fucking bash you the whole time. Not very welcoming...
The Internet.



False, twoism has never been unwelcoming to newcomers.

edit: REGARDLESS, back on topic.


And then doubled over laughing at this.

Wed Apr 24, 2013 10:53 pm

Cryabetes wrote:Came here to post this:
Image




hahaha!!!!!!! f-ing hilarious! thanks for posting that. I love spaceballs

Wed Apr 24, 2013 10:59 pm

Did anyone notice the lines on the Julie and Candy video changed?
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/803/screenshot20130424at655.png/
Last edited by cbm on Wed Apr 24, 2013 11:01 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Wed Apr 24, 2013 10:59 pm

Did anyone check today's edition of NME? I remember reading some theories about the next code being in print, but as I'm in Australia I can't check this..

Wed Apr 24, 2013 11:03 pm

cbm wrote:Did anyone notice the lines on the Julie and Candy video changed?
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/803/screenshot20130424at655.png/


Looks the same to me.

Wed Apr 24, 2013 11:04 pm

Capt Kittinger wrote:
cbm wrote:Did anyone notice the lines on the Julie and Candy video changed?
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/803/screenshot20130424at655.png/


Looks the same to me.


Two of the lines look solid instead of dashed. Maybe it's just me.

Wed Apr 24, 2013 11:07 pm

cbm wrote:
Capt Kittinger wrote:
cbm wrote:Did anyone notice the lines on the Julie and Candy video changed?
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/803/screenshot20130424at655.png/


Looks the same to me.


Two of the lines look solid instead of dashed. Maybe it's just me.


They do in your picture, but looking on YouTube - whilst the dashes look slightly blurred as to be connected, they are still separately identifiable and each group of 6 looks identical. To me, anyway.

Wed Apr 24, 2013 11:08 pm

Capt Kittinger wrote:
cbm wrote:
Capt Kittinger wrote:
cbm wrote:Did anyone notice the lines on the Julie and Candy video changed?
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/803/screenshot20130424at655.png/


Looks the same to me.


Two of the lines look solid instead of dashed. Maybe it's just me.


They do in your picture, but looking on YouTube - whilst the dashes look slightly blurred as to be connected, they are still separately identifiable and each group of 6 looks identical. To me, anyway.


Thanks. I think I've been staring at this too much. Need to get out of the house :shock:

Wed Apr 24, 2013 11:13 pm

Capt Kittinger wrote:Did anyone check today's edition of NME? I remember reading some theories about the next code being in print, but as I'm in Australia I can't check this..


Yup. Nothing! :?

Wed Apr 24, 2013 11:19 pm

cbm wrote:Thanks. I think I've been staring at this too much. Need to get out of the house :shock:

"Goobble gobble, Goobble gobble. We accept her. One of us, one of us."

Seriously though, oxygen and sunshine are your friends.

Wed Apr 24, 2013 11:24 pm

I can buy this radio silence thing that joyrex mentioned. Maybe no hints today, but I could see Adult Swim running with this in the US soon. I'm just happy knowing it's coming. Whether its 5/28, 6/4 or 6/24 (playing fast and loose with Mondays and Tuesdays, whether we're talking the US or the UK) I'm fine with whatever.

Wed Apr 24, 2013 11:29 pm

I'm not sure if this has been mentioned, but since the third video was changed to trails, is there a possibility of a clue being hidden in that old flash site? I think there's still a version of it up on the designer's site.

Wed Apr 24, 2013 11:31 pm

Such curious activity.
Post a reply