Joebot Kill wrote:are these your photos?
Only 2 first photos in 7 posts earlier, but chalangers used others photos, or not?
In anyway you can kill me if i am a real bastard
Moderators: Aesthetics, Drones, Hexagon Sun
Joebot Kill wrote:are these your photos?
Patryk Ludamage wrote:Joebot Kill wrote:are these your photos?
but chalangers used others photos, or not?
polar sky wrote:Patryk Ludamage wrote:Joebot Kill wrote:are these your photos?
but chalangers used others photos, or not?
I used my own photography, got the negatives to back it up
Patryk Ludamage wrote:Lucky guy! I wish to have a good camera the some day, because i have only shitty one in my phone
Neels wrote:Patryk Ludamage wrote:Lucky guy! I wish to have a good camera the some day, because i have only shitty one in my phone
I think you don't need an expensive camera to take a great picture.. It's not that easy, but it's possible. Sometimes crappy quality can be an advantage. The grainy look perhaps fits great with the nostalgy hidden in BoC.. Try it! Your own work is worth much more than using random photos from the net.
Neels wrote:Patryk Ludamage wrote:Lucky guy! I wish to have a good camera the some day, because i have only shitty one in my phone
I think you don't need an expensive camera to take a great picture.. It's not that easy, but it's possible. Sometimes crappy quality can be an advantage. The grainy look perhaps fits great with the nostalgy hidden in BoC.. Try it! Your own work is worth much more than using random photos from the net.

polar sky wrote:Neels wrote:Patryk Ludamage wrote:Lucky guy! I wish to have a good camera the some day, because i have only shitty one in my phone
I think you don't need an expensive camera to take a great picture.. It's not that easy, but it's possible. Sometimes crappy quality can be an advantage. The grainy look perhaps fits great with the nostalgy hidden in BoC.. Try it! Your own work is worth much more than using random photos from the net.
I used a 1984 Kodak Fisher Price 110 Film Camera. And A Dollar Store Camera with expired film.
Pantheon wrote:polar sky wrote:Neels wrote:Patryk Ludamage wrote:Lucky guy! I wish to have a good camera the some day, because i have only shitty one in my phone
I think you don't need an expensive camera to take a great picture.. It's not that easy, but it's possible. Sometimes crappy quality can be an advantage. The grainy look perhaps fits great with the nostalgy hidden in BoC.. Try it! Your own work is worth much more than using random photos from the net.
I used a 1984 Kodak Fisher Price 110 Film Camera. And A Dollar Store Camera with expired film.
Looks great tho man, realy awesome.

Patryk Ludamage wrote:Neels wrote:Patryk Ludamage wrote:Lucky guy! I wish to have a good camera the some day, because i have only shitty one in my phone
I think you don't need an expensive camera to take a great picture.. It's not that easy, but it's possible. Sometimes crappy quality can be an advantage. The grainy look perhaps fits great with the nostalgy hidden in BoC.. Try it! Your own work is worth much more than using random photos from the net.
Ok - i'll maybe try it![]()
I think that my works is usless and mr. Fredd-E have enough for a collection. I'll not make everyone angry with me anymore. sorry for my flood and i hope some useless posts will delete![]()
P.S. - it is my last post in this thread, sorry for long conversation

Pantheon wrote:Awww man, that logo is bad ass! Superb, but I think the logo you have to use had been decided. The backgrounds are awesome, reminds me of ISO50's designs.
Ray wrote:Pantheon wrote:Awww man, that logo is bad ass! Superb, but I think the logo you have to use had been decided. The backgrounds are awesome, reminds me of ISO50's designs.
Ah dang! I should've read all the pages before getting into it. Newb mistake. Thanks for the props man. Gonna keep working on the backround. Cheers.
Ray wrote:Pantheon wrote:Awww man, that logo is bad ass! Superb, but I think the logo you have to use had been decided. The backgrounds are awesome, reminds me of ISO50's designs.
Ah dang! I should've read all the pages before getting into it. Newb mistake. Thanks for the props man. Gonna keep working on the backround. Cheers.
Joebot Kill wrote:Patryk Ludamage wrote:Neels wrote:Patryk Ludamage wrote:Lucky guy! I wish to have a good camera the some day, because i have only shitty one in my phone
I think you don't need an expensive camera to take a great picture.. It's not that easy, but it's possible. Sometimes crappy quality can be an advantage. The grainy look perhaps fits great with the nostalgy hidden in BoC.. Try it! Your own work is worth much more than using random photos from the net.
Ok - i'll maybe try it![]()
I think that my works is usless and mr. Fredd-E have enough for a collection. I'll not make everyone angry with me anymore. sorry for my flood and i hope some useless posts will delete![]()
P.S. - it is my last post in this thread, sorry for long conversation
No one is angry with you Patryk. There's no harm in submitting your ideas. We are just giving feedback!
Patryk Ludamage wrote:In anyway - i just want to create for a collection one or five good banners with my previous photos.
If i'll use those logo in pds, my works will accept or in anyway i must to do something new with my own photos to get into collection?
Ray wrote:
and another
Users browsing this forum: bliss000, Redd Panderson, turquoise70, YELLOW and 24 guests